It’s taken more than three months, but UK EX30 owners are finally receiving an official letter from Volvo about the battery fire‑risk recall. Owners have been living with a 70% charge cap since before Christmas.
Now, with the DVSA formally involved, Volvo has begun sending out a safety notice that confirms what many suspected all along: this isn’t a software issue or a “precautionary measure”. It’s a hardware defect inside the high‑voltage battery modules, and in the wrong circumstances, it can overheat and potentially catch fire.
Dear Sir / Madam
IMPORTANT – VEHICLE SAFETY RECALL – RISK OF FIRE
Model: Volvo Registration Number: [Redacted]
Volvo Cars have completed a thorough investigation following reports of a very small number of batteries overheating on EX30s Single Motor Extended Range and Twin Motor Performance models. We understand from our records that you are the current registered keeper of a vehicle with the registration detailed above.
What is the issue?
Investigations have identified a potential hardware issue within the High Voltage Battery, which in very rare cases could cause the battery to overheat when charged above 70%. In the worst case scenario this could lead to a possible fire within the high voltage battery.
What are we doing to resolve this?
Volvo Cars will inspect and replace any affected battery modules. New modules are currently being built and shipped, and availability may be limited during this period.
What you should do now?
Do not charge your battery above 70%. Your retailer will contact you as soon as the parts are available, but you should set the charge limit to 70% immediately.
Set the maximum charge limit to 70%.
Press the vehicle symbol [Car Icon] in the bottom bar of the Infotainment screen and go to Settings.
Go to Charging → Select Custom option.
Set your charge level to maximum 70%.
Alternatively, the battery level limit can be set via the Volvo Cars app.
Volvo Cars is confident that by limiting the battery’s maximum state of charge to 70% this will eliminate the risk of overheating until the modules have been inspected and replaced as necessary. However, following discussions with the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA), they have recommended that the following precautions should also be followed:
A recall that arrives months late
The most striking thing about the letter isn’t the content — it’s the delay. UK owners have been left in the dark while other markets received clearer communication weeks earlier. Some found out more from forums and leaked dealer memos than from Volvo itself.
For a brand that built its reputation on safety, the silence has been baffling.
Still no timeline for repairs
Depite the recent flurry of letter to owners, Volvo still refuses to give any kind of timescale.
Owners are told that new battery modules are “being built and shipped”, which sounds reassuring until you realise it’s the same line they’ve been using since December. Retailers have no dates. No parts. No schedule. Just a list of customers they can’t help.
Three months in, that’s simply not good enough.
Living with a 70% cap is not sustainable
Volvo’s letter repeats the instruction to limit charging to 70%, as if this is a minor inconvenience. For many UK drivers, it’s anything but.
A car sold with a 250–300 mile range is suddenly operating at something closer to 150–180. That’s a huge drop, especially in winter, on motorways, or for anyone without home charging.
And that’s where the real‑world impact bites. Plenty of owners are now forced into public charging far more often than before — and paying the eye‑watering rates that come with it. Rapid charging at 70% is less efficient too, so you’re paying more for less. What’s even more worring is the impact rapid DC charging has on EV batteries. The situation is dire.
It’s certainly not what you expect from a brand‑new EV.
Communication has been poor from day one
The letter itself is polite, measured, and carefully worded — but it doesn’t address the elephant in the room: Volvo’s communication has been consistently poor.
- No regular updates
- No transparency about parts availability
- No explanation for the three‑month delay
- No support for owners who rely on their car for work
- No compensation for increased charging costs
- No courtesy cars for those whose range is now unusably low
Owners have been left to fend for themselves, trying to make sense of a recall that seems to move at a glacial pace. Many owners have resorted to social media – such as the Volvo EX30 UK Facebook page
A vehicle that isn’t fit for purpose
Under UK consumer law, a vehicle that cannot be used as advertised — or safely charged to its full capacity — is not fit for purpose. Right now, the EX30 falls squarely into that category.
Owners bought a car with a specific range, performance and capability. They’ve ended up with something far more limited, and for an indefinite period. Some are now questioning whether they should be pushing for refunds or replacements.
Volvo needs to do better
Now that the official letters are finally going out, Volvo can’t hide behind silence anymore. UK owners deserve:
- A clear timeline for repairs
- Transparency about parts production and supply
- Compensation for increased charging costs
- Mobility support where needed
- Honest, proactive communication
UK owners are being asked to live with a compromised car, a fire‑risk warning, and a manufacturer that seems reluctant to take responsibility. Three months of waiting is already too long. The fact that the official notification is only arriving now makes it even harder to swallow.
Let’s hear from you
How has the EX30 battery issue impacted you? Are you out of pocket? Have you managed to reject your car? Let us know your experiences in the comments.
Read more
Want to read more about the EX30 battery issues – check out our articles here – https://www.hypermiler.co.uk/category/volvo-ex30
